The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) is evidence of a massive shift in the mindset for institutions, faculty, and students alike. The conversation has decisively shifted from a fearful “Should we use AI?” to a proactive and critical “How do we integrate AI responsibly?” This transformation is a fundamental reckoning with our teaching methods, core values, and the very definition of a well-rounded education. 

Understanding the Change 

When AI models like ChatGPT burst onto the public scene, the initial reaction in academia was often panic. It was more of a concern that AI would render traditional assessment methods obsolete and encourage intellectual shortcuts. As Dr. Brian Arnold, Chair of National University’s AI Council, points out, this initial anxiety is a natural response, rooted in fears of job displacement and the dystopian possibilities of powerful technology. 

However, the conversation must move past the “red-eyed robots” scenario. AI is already deeply embedded in our workflows, and denying its presence is futile. The current phase demands that institutions move through this “trough of disillusionment”—the realization of what the technology is and isn’t—and start defining cultural norms and governing principles for its use. This transition requires creating a safe space for faculty to voice their concerns, address myths, and begin to explore the practical, rather than existential, implications of AI. 

The Human Responsibility 

At the heart of a responsible adoption strategy is the concept of the “Humane Technologist.” This is a philosophy that shifts the burden of responsibility away from solely the tech corporations and places it firmly on the user, the student, the professor, and the administrator. 

As users, we must develop a sense of self-regulation and critical consumption. Dr. Arnold stresses that the goal isn’t just to enjoy new tools but to advocate for and use tools that serve us and enhance our well-being, rather than those that simply harvest us for data or promote unhealthy engagement. This requires conscious self-awareness: 

• Scrutinize the Output: Don’t just accept AI-generated text as final. The human user must remain the boss and the ultimate accountable party for any work submitted. Failing to do so simply “kicks the problem downstream,” reducing the quality of work and eroding accountability. 

• Check Your Engagement: Are you using the tool for its intended, beneficial purpose, or are you falling into a “stimming cycle” where efficiency becomes a trap for over-engagement? Students and faculty must pause to reflect on whether the technology is genuinely amplifying their work or merely increasing their velocity without purpose. 

• Advocate for Better Tools: By providing informed feedback and demanding transparency, educators can influence the development of AI to ensure it is designed with ethical principles and educational integrity as a core feature, not an afterthought. 

The Efficiency Trap 

AI’s most immediate and undeniable impact is its promise of efficiency. For students, this means generating first drafts, outlines, and research summaries in seconds. For faculty, it means automating rubrics, drafting communications, or even assisting in course design. 

However, the pursuit of efficiency can quickly lead to what one report dubbed “AI-generated work slop.” When users prioritize speed above all else, they skip the crucial step of intellectual engagement that includes the interrogating, editing, and critical thinking that turns raw information into meaningful knowledge. 

The true value of AI in education lies not in replacing work but in amplifying human potential. The challenge for educators is to design assignments that utilize AI for the tedious parts (the “slop”) while requiring students to apply higher- order thinking skills like accountability, judgment, and original critique to the final output. The AI should serve as an assistant, allowing students to explore more complex problems and iterations than they could achieve manually, thereby deepening their learning. 

Redesigning Learning for the AI Era 

To move forward, higher education must redefine what is being taught and how skills are being measured. The focus must shift from measuring information retrieval to measuring durable human skills that AI cannot replace. 

1. The Primacy of Durable Skills 

The curriculum must pivot to prioritize skills such as: 

• Critical Thinking and Ethical Judgment: The ability to question AI results, identify algorithmic bias, and make informed ethical decisions is paramount. 

• Effective Prompt Engineering: The quality of the AI output is only as good as the human input. Students need to learn to craft precise, clear prompts that leverage AI effectively. 

• Accountability and Ownership: Students must own their work, whether or not AI was used. Institutions need frameworks that treat the use of AI as they would any other assistant—the student remains responsible for the outcome. 

2. A Call for Transparency 

The era of secretive AI use must end. Institutions should establish clear policies on transparent use, encouraging students and faculty to openly declare when, where, and how AI contributed to a piece of work. This encourages a culture of honesty and allows assessors to evaluate the student’s unique intellectual contribution. 

3. Lifelong Learning and Certification 

Given the exponential pace of technological change, a single degree is no longer sufficient. Higher education must increasingly focus on systems of lifelong learning and certification. Credentials in AI literacy, ethical technology use, and technical applications will become essential for students and professionals to adapt continuously, ensuring they remain empowered and not displaced by the accelerating pace of change. 

Shaping the Next Decade 

The impact of AI on higher education is an ongoing story, not a completed one. The challenge is not to retreat to past methods but to actively shape the next generation of learning environments. By encouraging a culture of humane technology adoption, focusing on durable human skills, and demanding accountability and transparency, institutions can ensure that AI becomes a powerful tool that amplifies the learning experience and prepares students to lead ethically in an exponentially accelerating world. 

The question for every leader, educator, and student is, will you allow the technology to dictate the terms, or will you take responsibility for defining a humane, powerful, and equitable framework for its use? 

Recent Blogs