AI CERTS
4 hours ago
BCG AI Gap: What Product Management Leaders Must Do Now
Moreover, the technology already delivers seventeen percent of realised AI value. BCG projects that share will reach twenty-nine percent by 2028. These numbers challenge every discipline, especially Product Management, to redesign work for machine collaboration. Future-built firms earn nearly double the revenue uplift of laggards. They also report forty percent greater cost savings. Therefore, practitioners must move beyond pilots and measure real P&L impact.
BCG Value Gap Explained
BCG groups respondents into three maturity tiers. Future-built firms lead with institutionalised capabilities across strategy, data, and governance. Scaling companies generate some value yet remain inconsistent. Laggards make up the majority and achieve limited gains. Additionally, future-built organizations allocate fifteen percent of AI budgets to autonomous agents. Scalers dedicate far less, at roughly five percent. Consequently, leaders enjoy 1.7 times revenue growth and stronger EBIT margins.

Value concentration appears in sales, manufacturing, supply chains, pricing, and R&D. Those functions hold nearly seventy percent of potential gains. In contrast, information technology captures only thirteen percent. The insight reframes investment priorities. Routine processes with high volume and clear metrics become early candidates. However, leaders also target complex workflows demanding advanced Reasoning across disparate systems. Effective Product Management orchestrates stakeholder alignment during that prioritisation process.
These findings underscore a performance chasm. Future-built firms convert AI spending into market advantage, while others dilute budgets across disconnected pilots. Therefore, decision makers must benchmark maturity realistically. The next section explores agentic dynamics shaping that imperative.
Key Statistics Snapshot Data
- 5% future-built firms realise material AI value.
- 35% are scaling, while 60% remain laggards.
- Agentic AI contributes 17% of value today; forecast 29% by 2028.
- Future-built firms report 1.7x revenue growth and 40% higher cost reductions.
- 70% of value concentrates in six core functions.
This quantitative view clarifies the urgency. Nevertheless, statistics alone do not craft strategy. Executives must translate numbers into action plans. Consequently, we now examine how agentic systems influence operating models.
Agentic AI Drives Gains
Agentic AI differs from single-step models because it acts, learns, and plans. Moreover, agents handle Routine requests and complex Reasoning with equal fluency. They chain Tools, APIs, and databases to execute multi-step workflows. Therefore, organisations can automate Manual approvals, data reconciliations, and creative Tasks previously assigned to analysts.
BCG reports that one third of future-built companies already run agents in production. In contrast, only twelve percent of scaling firms do so. The budget gap shows how early commitment amplifies returns. Furthermore, agentic systems unlock higher order benefits. They free scarce talent for strategic design and accelerate end-to-end Transformation initiatives.
However, agentic AI is not plug-and-play. Teams must redesign data pipelines, establish guardrails, and embed human review. Additionally, governance frameworks must track agent actions, ensure compliance, and capture feedback loops. These prerequisites affect Product Management roadmaps directly. We will now connect the dots.
Agentic systems escalate both opportunity and complexity. Consequently, disciplined leadership becomes paramount. The following section evaluates implications for Product Management practice.
Implications For Product Management
Every digital product now sits inside an AI-first context. Consequently, Product Management leaders must integrate agent capabilities into feature planning. They should specify clear value metrics tied to revenue, cost, or risk. Moreover, roadmaps must prioritise user flows where Routine decisions slow throughput. Embedding Reasoning agents can cut cycle times and elevate customer satisfaction.
Agent integration also changes backlog grooming. Teams will decompose Manual user Tasks into microservices that agents orchestrate. Therefore, epics must describe human-agent collaboration steps explicitly. Additionally, acceptance criteria should include edge-case Reasoning tests to guard against hallucinations.
Skills shift as well. Product Management managers need literacy in prompt engineering, chain design, and agent monitoring. Practitioners can formalise capabilities through the AI Product Manager™ certification. The curriculum covers AI ethics, data governance, and multi-agent architectures.
These adjustments ensure that AI capabilities align with user value and regulatory standards. Nevertheless, they require structured change management. The next section addresses typical barriers and mitigation tactics.
Leadership Playbook Core Essentials
BCG identifies four enablers behind future-built success. Firstly, executives anchor AI programs on P&L outcomes. Secondly, they invest in modern data platforms, eliminating Manual data wrangling. Thirdly, they create cross-functional pods that blend engineering, design, and Product Management. Finally, they institutionalise governance, using dashboards to track agent performance and Reasoning quality.
Beyond structure, culture matters. Moreover, leading firms foster experimentation but punish uncontrolled releases. They upskill workers through credential programs and communities of practice. Consequently, Transformation momentum compounds over time.
For practitioners seeking a roadmap, BCG suggests a phased approach:
- Diagnose capability gaps across 41 dimensions.
- Prioritise high value use cases with measurable KPIs.
- Deploy pilot agents with tight human oversight.
- Scale successes and retire underperforming models.
- Continuously refresh governance against evolving regulation.
These steps align AI delivery with strategic intent. In contrast, ad-hoc experiments rarely generalise. The next section reviews operational hurdles you should anticipate.
Operational Barriers And Fixes
Common obstacles include legacy infrastructure, fragmented data, and unclear accountability. However, leaders overcome them with modular architectures and federated data models. They also automate Routine monitoring Tasks to free engineers for higher value work.
Security and compliance pose another challenge. Agentic systems may take unexpected actions without robust Reasoning constraints. Therefore, governance frameworks must implement kill switches, audit trails, and continuous testing.
Change fatigue represents a softer barrier. Employees fear Automation will erase roles. Nevertheless, transparent communication and targeted reskilling ease anxiety. Offering the AI Product Manager™ credential signals investment in people, not replacement.
Addressing these barriers accelerates program velocity. Subsequently, organisations gain bandwidth to pursue broader Transformation goals. The final section outlines practical next steps for readers.
Next Steps And Certification
Readers should begin with a candid maturity assessment against BCG’s benchmarks. Moreover, link findings to specific Product Management responsibilities. Map where agents can replace Manual chores and where human judgment remains essential.
Then, design a backlog that balances quick wins and structural Transformation. Include Routine automation, richer analytics features, and improved end-to-end Tasks.
Upskill teams early. Consequently, enrolling in the AI Product Manager™ program accelerates competency and credibility.
Finally, fund multi-year roadmaps, not episodic pilots. Therefore, sustained investment turns AI ambition into measurable shareholder value.
These actions create a flywheel of learning, delivery, and advantage. Meanwhile, the gap between leaders and laggards continues to widen. Taking decisive steps today safeguards competitive position.
BCG’s 2025 study delivers a stark warning. Only a tiny elite has mastered AI at scale. However, the path to catch up is clear. Prioritise P&L value, embed agentic capabilities, and overhaul operating models. Product Management must champion this agenda by linking every feature to measurable results. Moreover, leaders should invest in talent, governance, and multi-year roadmaps. Consequently, firms can transform lagging experiments into sustained advantage. Ready to lead the charge? Explore the AI Product Manager™ certification and turn insight into impact. Additionally, share these lessons across engineering, design, and finance to embed AI thinking enterprise-wide. Continual measurement will keep momentum high and executives accountable.