What’s the Issue? 

Google’s rapid rollout of AI-powered search tools, including AI Mode and AI-generated summaries, has made it easier than ever for users to get answers instantly. These features analyze and summarize web content using generative AI results, delivering concise overviews directly at the top of search pages. 

But critics argue that this innovation comes at a cost: traditional links are pushed down or ignored altogether, reducing visibility for publishers, smaller websites, and even competing search engines. 

The UK CMA is examining whether this behavior gives Google an unfair edge—potentially qualifying as Google self-preferencing—and whether it violates the principles of search engine transparency and fair competition. 

What Could Change? 

If the CMA designates Google as having strategic market status, it could lead to a range of regulatory requirements, including: 

• A mandatory search engine selection screen for users in the UK. 

• Rules preventing Google AI search from prioritizing its own services 

• New controls for publishers on how their content is used in AI-generated summaries 

• Clear explanations of how AI-powered search tools select and rank content 

These changes would aim to restore search engine transparency and level the digital playing field for content creators and smaller competitors. 

Google Responds 

In response, Google maintains that its AI search enhancements are designed to improve user experience and provide faster, more accurate results. The company insists that AI-powered search tools are optional and still link to source websites. 

Google spokesperson Oliver Bethell described the CMA’s current findings as speculative, warning that premature restrictions could stifle AI search innovation and harm both users and businesses. 

Still, the tech giant faces increasing scrutiny worldwide, with AI search regulation now a hot topic in the European Union, the United States, and other major markets. 

Why This Matters Globally 

The UK’s action signals a broader shift in how governments may regulate AI-powered search tools. As generative AI results become more prominent in search experiences, regulators are asking: 

• Are AI tools amplifying big tech dominance? 

• Is there enough search engine transparency around how content is chosen? 

• Should users have more control over how they interact with Google AI search? 

The outcome of the CMA’s investigation could influence how other countries define rules for AI search, especially when it comes to Google self-preferencing and the rights of digital publishers. 

What Happens Next? 

A decision from the UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) is anticipated by October 13, 2025. If the watchdog proceeds with enforcement, Google may be forced to redesign elements of Google AI search within the UK and possibly beyond. 

Meanwhile, other governments are watching closely. Any action taken in the UK could ripple across the global tech policy landscape, setting a precedent for AI search regulation and platform accountability. 

Final Thoughts 

The battle over AI search is no longer just about technology—it’s about fairness, transparency, and who controls access to digital information. Google’s leadership in this space is undeniable, but with power comes responsibility. 

As regulatory bodies like the UK CMA take a closer look at AI-powered search tools, the balance between innovation and market fairness is entering a new phase. Whether the outcome results in new policies, more choices for users, or structural changes in search engines, one thing is clear: the age of AI-generated summaries is here, and so is the debate about how they should be used. 

📚 Curious about more AI breakthroughs? Read our next feature on AI Coding Assistant Released: Amazon Debuts CodeCompanion.